TV firm fallacious to broadcast interview which will affect trial - Opinion

[ad_1]

A micro weblog put up revealed by Jiang Qiulian requires demise sentence given to the homicide suspect who allegedly killed her daughter, Jiang Ge.

A CHINESE MOTHER whose daughter, a postgraduate pupil, died over a 12 months in the past in Tokyo after allegedly being attacked by a Chinese language graduate pupil whose former girlfriend she was attempting to defend, is looking for the demise penalty in his trial. The decision is because of be delivered by a Japanese court docket on Dec 11. Southern Metropolis Each day commented on Tuesday:

Jiang Ge, a 24-year-old Chinese language pupil, was discovered useless with a number of stab wounds within the hall of her Tokyo residence greater than a 12 months in the past, having reportedly fallen sufferer to a quarrel between her roommate and her roommate’s ex-boyfriend. She was finishing her postgraduate research.

The roommate survived, but refused to satisfy Jiang’s mom face-to-face, in accordance with reviews. She even modified her telephone quantity and her household moved dwelling to keep away from public consideration, in accordance with Jiang’s grieving mom, who posted on-line and offline notices to hint their whereabouts.

The primary encounter between Jiang’s mom and the girl whose former associate has been accused of murdering Jiang occurred lately when a veteran tv producer managed to entice each of them in entrance of cameras.

Nonetheless, the kin of victims are usually not supposed to satisfy with key witnesses previous to a court docket handing down its verdict. Whether or not the televised assembly will evoke a public outcry towards one of many events within the case, notably the suspect, stays unclear. However the threat of it influencing the court docket’s resolution can’t be dominated out, not least when many have already drawn their very own conclusion regardless of the shortage of clearcut proof within the case. That individuals are already pointing fingers earlier than the court docket’s verdict is due to this fact uncalled for.

 

[ad_2]

Source link